How to prepare a proposal
To apply for funding you need to fill in an application form and prepare some accompanying documentation.
Case for support:
Other attachments:
There is some extra guidance for
projects made up of multiple proposals.
Some calls for proposals may have specific requirements - these will be described in the call.
Format
Font size 11 is the minimum font that is acceptable, and the minimum
margin in all directions is 2cm. For accessibility purposes, a
sans-serif font style such as Arial or Helvetica should be used as these
are more easily readable to those with visual impairment. For the same
reason, type should be justified only on the left hand side. If your
case for support exceeds the page limit, or doesn't adhere to the
specified format, your proposal will not be considered. More specific
instructions for the format of the case for support may be given in
certain funding opportunities and calls for proposals.
Information in the public domain
Please note that if successful, some of the information you submit on the grant application form will be published through
Grants on the Web (GoW).
Before writing your proposal, we advise you take a look at some example
grant records on these webpages so you can see what information would
be made available in the public domain. Unfunded applications will not
have this information published.
Applicant Guidance on constructing your proposal
Previous Research Track Record
This section (maximum two sides of A4) gives you the opportunity to
demonstrate that the team involved in the proposed project has the
appropriate mix of skills, expertise and experience to carry out the
research. This is particularly important for multi-disciplinary
proposals. You should include:
- a summary of the results and conclusions of the applicants’
recent work in the technological/scientific area which is covered by the
research proposal. Include reference to both EPSRC funded work and
non-EPSRC funded work.
- the specific expertise available for the research at the host
organisation and that of any associated organisations and beneficiaries.
- details of relevant past collaborative work with industry and/or with other beneficiaries.
- details of where the applicants’ previous work has contributed to the UK's competitiveness or to improving the quality of life.
Description of Proposed Research and its Context
This section (maximum six sides of A4) should include:
Background
- Introduce the topic of research and explain its academic and industrial context.
- Demonstrate a knowledge and understanding of past and current work in the subject area in the UK and abroad.
National Importance
- Describe the extent to which, over the long term, for example 10-50 years, the research proposed:
- contributes to, or helps maintain the health of other
research disciplines, contributes to addressing key UK societal
challenges, contributes to current or future UK economic success and/or
enables future development of key emerging industry(s)
- meets national strategic needs by establishing or
maintaining a unique world leading research activity (including areas of
niche capability)
- fits with and complements other UK research already funded
in the area or related areas, including the relationship to the EPSRC
portfolio and our stated strategy set out in “Our Portfolio.”
The extent to which applicants are able to address each bullet point
will depend on the nature of the research proposed. Applicants should
indicate how their research relates to EPSRC’s
research areas and strategies
(many projects will be relevant to more than 1 EPSRC research area) and
complements EPSRC's current portfolio. Information on the portfolio is
available through the
EPSRC's Grants on the Web (GoW).
The definition of National Importance and further details can be found at
preparing new proposals to include National Importance.
Academic Impact
Describe how the research will benefit other researchers in the field
and in related disciplines, both within the UK and elsewhere. What will
be done to ensure that they can benefit?
- Explain any collaboration with other researchers and their role
in the project. For each Visiting Researcher, set out why they are the
most appropriate person, and what they will contribute to the project.
Research Hypothesis and Objectives
- Set out the research idea or hypothesis.
- Explain why the proposed project is of sufficient timeliness and novelty to warrant consideration for funding.
- Identify the overall aims of the project and the individual
measurable objectives against which you would wish the outcome of the
work to be assessed.
Programme and Methodology
- Detail the methodology to be used in pursuit of the research and justify this choice.
- Describe the programme of work, indicating the research to be
undertaken and the milestones that can be used to measure its progress.
The detail should be sufficient to indicate the programme of work for
each member of the research team. Explain how the project will be
managed.
Note: Lists of references and illustrations should
be included in the six page limit and should not be submitted as
additional attachments or as an annex.
Writing a good case for support
- The case for support is your opportunity to convince your peers of why your proposed research should be funded.
- A good case is clear, concise and not cluttered with technical jargon.
- To ensure effective provision of all required information, while
avoiding undue repetition within the limited space available, we
recommend the following approach:
- Impact Summary: Use this section of the
Je-S application form to identify who the potential economic and
societal beneficiaries might be and how they may benefit should the
research objectives be fully achieved.
- Academic Beneficiaries: Use this section of
the Je-S application form to summarise how the research might benefit
other researchers in the field, who might benefit in other disciplines
and what will be done to ensure they benefit
- Pathways to Impact: Use this annex to the
proposal to describe activities that can be undertaken during the
project to accelerate the route to the identified benefits being
realised; shortening the time between discovery and use of knowledge.
Also identify the additional resources needed to undertake these
activities.
- Case for Support: Include a National
Importance section within this document to justify why this proposal
warrants support by the UK taxpayer. Describe how the potential benefits
align with national priorities, how the research relates to EPSRC’s
research areas and strategies, and how it complements other research
activity in the field. It is anticipated that this section should not
require more than one or two paragraphs for most proposals.
- What is exciting about the research? Try to convey this to your
audience, in particular the reviewers. You need to convince these
experts in your own research field about the value of your project.
- Provide a convincing case for the originality of your proposal
and describe your objectives clearly and succinctly. Proposals are not
rejected just because others are doing similar work. But if you don't
describe the novelty of your approach and the likelihood of success when
compared with others, the value of your proposal may be questioned.
- It's best not to leave it to EPSRC or your peers to ask the
questions. Show that you have thought the proposal through and explain
how it will succeed. Potential applications might be obvious to you but
tell us what they are so we are left in no doubt.
Pathways to Impact (maximum two sides of A4)
In the Impact Summary, you will have described who potential
beneficiaries might be, and how the research might impact them. This
document is your opportunity to describe what you will actually do to
facilitate this. Ideally the Pathways to Impact attachment is specific
to users and beneficiaries of the research outside the academic research
community, but plans for academic impact may be included where this
forms part of the critical pathway towards economic and societal impact.
Detailed guidance on Pathways to Impact
is available. In summary, the document should describe the kinds of
impact envisaged, how the proposed research project will be managed to
engage users and beneficiaries and increase the likelihood of impacts,
including (wherever appropriate):
- Methods for communications and engagement
- Collaboration and exploitation in the most effective and appropriate manner
- The project team’s track record in this area
- The resources required for these activities. Please ensure these
are also captured in the financial summary and the Justification of
Resources.
Work Plan
The programme of work for the project should be illustrated with a
simple diagrammatic work plan, for example, a PERT or Gantt chart.
Justification of Resources
In this document (up to two sides of A4) you should explain why the
resources you've requested are required to undertake your research
project, including implementing the impact plan. This is to help
reviewers to make an informed judgement about whether the resources
requested are appropriate for the research proposed.
So that you don't miss anything out, we recommend that you follow the
'cost to the proposal' headings used in the application form. For more
information about what to do see how to write a justification of
resources.
Curriculum Vitaes
CVs should be submitted as a separate attachment for named research
staff or visiting researchers. For visiting researchers include details
of previous visits or collaborations with overseas researchers. CVs must
not exceed 2 sides of A4 each. You do not need to submit CVs for the
principal investigator or any co-investigators.
Statements of Support
Statements of support from all project partners should be included as
an attachment. There is no page limit. As part of the assessment of
impact, we ask reviewers to comment on whether a collaboration is
appropriate. A good statement of support can help by showing that the
collaboration is genuine, and by explaining why the project partner
supports the project and what they will get out of it.
Statements should be relevant to the project, written by project
partners when the proposal is being prepared and dated within six months
of the proposal submission date. Standard letters declaring general
support are often criticised by reviewers. For more information, see
guidance on what makes a good statement of support.
Letters of Support
In exceptional circumstances EPSRC will accept letters of support
which do not meet the above requirements for Statements of Support.
These will be cases where an organisation can not be listed as a project
partner, for example when the host institution wants to detail a
proposed contribution to the cost of the equipment.
However, unless there are exceptional reasons why an organisation can
not meet the requirements to be a project partner, any supporting
documentation should meet the above requirements for statements of
support.
Equipment quotes
This information is for all equipment costing more than £10,000 (including VAT).
Equipment costs are now only mandatory for equipment costing the OJEU
threshold or more. For equipment costing over £25,000 and below the
OJEU threshold, it is optional to provide up to three equipment quotes.
If you are applying for equipment costing the OJEU threshold or more, you need to use
EPSRC's Strategic Equipment Process.
For all items of this value, three equipment quotations must be
uploaded. Equipment quotations are added within the equipment item
screen, not within the attachments section. Having added the details for
your item press “Save” which will then provide a link to add the
attachments. Where you believe that there are less than three potential
suppliers for an item you should explain this in the Justification of
Resources attachment.
Technical Assessments for Facility Use
If you are planning to use a major facility as part of the proposed
research, such as those funded centrally by EPSRC or a European
facility, you'll be asked to provide a technical assessment from the
service provider. You should contact the facility before applying to
EPSRC to check if your proposed research is feasible and obtain a
technical assessment if necessary. If a technical assessment is not
necessary, then you will need to upload a blank document.
Host Organisation Statements (for First Grants Only)
If you're applying through the First Grant scheme you should attach a
statement from your host university, typically from your head of
department. The statement should describe the commitment the university
is making to the development of your research career, and confirm your
appointment details and period of probation if relevant. There's no page
limit. For more information see host organisation statement for first
grants.
Choosing reviewers
We will approach at least one of the reviewers that you nominate.
Please suggest people who are experts in the research field and/or able
to judge the value of the research to people who might use its results.
It's important that we avoid any conflicts between personal interests
and EPSRC's interests. You should not suggest reviewers that you have
had a close working relationship with in the past (for example, your PhD
supervisor), current or proposed project partners, anyone from your own
organisation, or anyone with financial or personal connections with the
organisations involved in the proposal. Please avoid suggesting more
than one reviewer from the same organisation.
Contact us
Our portfolio managers are happy to discuss proposals before
submission. We particularly encourage discussion of proposals with a
complex management structure, those involving large consortia, or those
consisting of more than one research theme.
Search EPSRC staff contacts
[usu attrib 通常作定语] in the natural state; unrefined 天然的;
未提炼的: 
(a) not well finished; not completely worked out;
rough 粗陋的; 未完成的; 粗糙的: